One of the most problematic issues that faces the Church today is
church politics. Church politics, in its simplest definition, boils down to the
practice of putting what we think is most important ahead of what God says is
most important. In my time I've been associated with churches of all ages;
churches that were new, freshly planted, churches that were matured and
sometime set in their ways, churches that were growing, and churches that were
stagnant. I've had the opportunity to observe this phenomenon of “church
politics” from many angles.
When a church is newly planted, and in the early pains of
its infancy and early growth there is almost always a unity of vision of what
the church wants to be and what direction it’s headed. Yet as the church grows
larger almost inevitably the unity of vision is lost. Leadership becomes
fragmented in their direction as people begin to try and implement their own
vision of where the church should go, without the unity of the leaders or the
people. A major reason for this fragmentation is ego. Let me share a personal
experience:
For a number of years in my recent past I had regularly
attended a local Community church, a “seeker” church, if you will, with the
desire and direction of making a welcoming environment for people seeking to
fill that void in their heart. It was dynamic, it was growing, and it was
exciting. I served in that church in several ministries. As we grew I began to
notice this “church politics” growing, as there seemed to be a growing power
struggle among leadership, perhaps desire for recognition. In one of the ministries
I served a problem arose between the Elder in charge and one of the volunteer
leaders. I thought the best way to handle it was to make the elder aware and discuss
the situation before feelings got hurt and things got out of hand. I was
expressly warned by my team leaders not to do so, or I “might get run out of
church” like several others. Still, I sent him a note and we met.
During our meeting, this Elder, a “pillar” of the church,
got angry and accused me of lying, of creating a mess that I needed to clean
up. He claimed he’d talked to the parties and they disavowed any knowledge of
any problem, that I was a liar, that I was a trouble-maker. So I turned on my
computer, I opened my e-mails from the two parties, and I let him read for
himself that everything I said was true. What was his response? I made a mess
and I needed to clean it up. Not any acceptance of the fact that I spoke truth,
that my concern was for the ministry and perhaps he should address his
shortcomings in the situation. No apology was forth coming for calling me a
liar, no sorrow for the pain and hurt feelings his words and actions had
caused. Why not? - Because his ego wouldn’t allow him to
acknowledge his wrong-doing. There’s no place for our ego when we’re serving
God.
Another issue stemming from church politics is loss of
vision. The community church that I recently attended had an early vision of
reaching out to those seeking to fill that void that one has when not in community
with Jesus Christ. The services were welcoming and open for anyone who wanted
to experience Christian worship. Yet
today, though the “vision” is still to reach out to “seekers” it has become
lost in the “production” of each service. The emphasis is no longer on the act
of worship; the emphasis is on the seeker. The whole reason for the church is
for Christians to meet in corporate
worship, and it is the worship that draws the seekers. When they come in
and find others who are broken, who are flawed, but who live in joy and peace
they want that, they seek to know more. But once the focus becomes the seeker
the power of the worship experience is quenched. Corporate worship is the
worship of God, not numbers of people you can get in to fill the seats…
I believe that a church needs to maintain a unity of spirit
to remain vibrant and growing. A church needs to constantly recommit its vision
and focus to the Lord. How can they best do this? How can churches avoid the
pitfalls of church politics? First, change leadership regularly. Get new people
in to serve. Church after church that I've observed has had the same people run
for church offices year after year. It’s no wonder that egos build, that power
struggles arise! Churches should have term limits. We see the same problem in
our government- men who serve term after term, grow in power and “prestige”
until they become a legend in their own mind. Limit the term, limit the power,
and ultimately limit the damage that church politics can cause. The problem won’t
be gone completely, for we are still flawed and broken human beings. But if
there’s a problem in leadership term limits is a definite cure, for time will
remove it if we don’t.
Last, I think churches need to focus less on size, on how
many people they can pack in on any given weekend, and more on worship (the reason to gather corporately) for size ultimately becomes
a pride issue. Sure, everyone wants to grow, but there comes a point where size
hinders worship. My daughter pointed out to me that Jesus preached to
thousands- but Jesus didn't preach to thousands every weekend, every service.
No, when he needed recharging he met with his disciples, or withdrew alone to
pray. Also, it’s worth pointing out, that despite listening to many wonderfully
talented preachers and speakers in my days not one of them was the Son of God.
Sometimes size begins to hinder worship. It becomes a production instead of a worship, and then the focus is lost. The early churches were “house churches”,
meeting in the homes of the early Christians. By their very nature they
couldn't be “large”- when they outgrew a home they split into several homes.
Intimacy and unity had to be trademarks of the early church, for the very size
made it so. Perhaps we need more of that model church…
Food for thought…
No comments:
Post a Comment